Republik Of Mancunia |
- Manchester United’s youth in 2013-2014… compared to Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City
- How Meulensteen revolutionised the youth at United
- Time for Morrison to come home?
Manchester United’s youth in 2013-2014… compared to Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City Posted: 29 Dec 2013 07:32 AM PST When Manchester United played Hull earlier this week, we were reminded of the five players on their books who started their football careers at United’s academy. Research from the CIES Football Observatory shows that Manchester United have produced more professional footballers than any other English club, but whilst we know our players have gone to have successful careers at other clubs, just how many Premier League games are our own players getting at United? Manchester United Tom Cleverley – 15 appearances Total: 65 appearances, 9 goals. Arsenal Kieran Gibbs – 17 appearances Total: 39 appearances, 3 goals Liverpool 25 appearances, 4 goals Chelsea Total: 19 appearances, 2 goals Manchester City Micah Richards – 2 Total: 3 appearances |
How Meulensteen revolutionised the youth at United Posted: 29 Dec 2013 06:43 AM PST Youngster’s learning curve, The Telegraph, September 30th 2005 When Manchester United’s Academy boys glide from their dressing rooms at the club’s magnificent skill factory hidden deep in the Trafford countryside, they run past 10-foot high photographs of David Beckham, Sir Bobby Charlton, Duncan Edwards, Ryan Giggs and George Best. “We want them to be inspired,” said Rene Meulensteen, United’s skills development coach. They are inspired. In the ensuing sessions of drills and small-sided games, the technique, ambition and vision of United’s youngsters borders on the breath-taking. “If this generation carries on maturing,” confided Meulensteen on Monday night, “they will steamroller everyone at Under-18 level. They’ll have skills coming out of their ears.” Sited adjacent to United’s senior complex at Carrington, the Academy heaved with 10-year-olds dropping shoulders, rolling the foot over the top of the ball a la Zidane, and executing the type of step-over that Cristiano Ronaldo inflicted on Benfica the following evening. The kids ran off, replacing lost fluids with isotonic drinks, laughing among each other about tricks they had tried out. They all changed, some pulling on the shirts of their home-town clubs like Preston and Burnley, and walked into the coaches’ room to shake hands with Meulensteen and his chatty staff. “Any kid who comes here will leave a better human being, and a better player,” said the Academy director, Les Kershaw. “We try to teach them right and wrong things. When they come in, they come and shake hands. ‘Hello, how are you.’ It’s proper. When Sir Alex Ferguson came once, one of the little lads said: ‘Hiya, boss. How are you?’ Two lads misheard him and said: ‘Hiya, Bob. How are you?’ Bob!” Laughter is a constant sound at the Academy. Yet there is a serious issue that United want brought into the open, much as it may antagonise other clubs. United want to revolutionise coaching of the Under-9 to Under-11 age-group, focusing more on developing skills in four-v-four games than contesting blood-and-thunder eight-v-eight club skirmishes. Sitting next to the famous 1970 photograph of Bobby Moore embracing Pele, Meulensteen called for a fusion of English zeal and Brazilian flair. “In Brazil, if a boy goes on the beach with a nice swimming bottom on but he hasn’t got any skill, everyone says ‘you just sit down’,” Meulensteen said. “Here the football culture is more ‘get stuck in’. We are trying to marry the two cultures together. Wayne Rooney has that character of wanting to win, and the skill to beat players. “Why did Eric Cantona, Pele and Romario make the difference? Why does Ronaldinho? Under pressure, they have the ability to create a better situation. You can be as physically strong as you want, as tactically well-organised as you want, but you can never beat players like Maradona, Cruyff, Best or Zidane. They can unlock defences. “In the last 15 years, the emphasis has been on physical and tactical development, not conceding goals and getting something from a set-play. That’s not entertainment. We have been relying on God-gifted players – Cruyff, Best, Maradona – and once every five years somebody else pops up. Somebody [Rooney] popped up at Everton a couple of years ago. We want a development programme that gives us four or five Rooneys.” With United’s Academy complex costing a third of the £27 million Ferguson spent on Rooney, it makes sense to groom your own. “We want players who can do the unpredictable like Rooney,” Meulensteen continued. “I see too many one-dimensional players at the top level. We inspire kids to take players on. In the attacking third, it’s all guns blazing. Sir Alex has been totally supportive. He came and watched what the little kids can do and said: ‘Carry on.’ The manager has experience of what it means when local lads come good.” “At 16, we could play Scholesy for only 20 minutes a game. He couldn’t run. He was a little one. Had asthma. No strength. No power. No athleticism. No endurance. ‘You’ve got a bleeding dwarf,’ I remember somebody said to Brian Kidd [the then youth-team coach]. ‘You will eat your words,’ said Kiddo. If Scholesy had been at a lesser club, they would have got rid of him and he would probably not be in the game now. We stuck with Scholesy, a wonderful technician. How many caps did he get? Sixty-six?!” In the 21st century, when street football has largely disappeared, Kershaw asked Meulensteen to come to Carrington and hone the techniques of the heirs to the Scholes generation. The Dutchman put on a coaching demonstration for Ferguson and was appointed immediately. “Rene has spells working with Van Nistelrooy, Chris Eagles and Giuseppi Rossi, who all pick at his brains, but his role is development of young boys,” Kershaw said. “He is the best coach in the world for kids.” Raised in the land of Total Football, Meulensteen’s obsession with encouraging skills dovetailed perfectly with the creed of Ferguson, Kershaw and enlightened Academy stalwarts like Brian McClair and Tony Whelan. “Seven to 10 is the golden age of learning, so we work on their technique at a young age,” Whelan said. “Rene came in,” Kershaw continued, “and said it was not helpful to put Under-9 kids into Premier League eight-a-side football games against other clubs with mums and dads on touchlines shouting ‘get stuck in’. When we played some teams it was like World War Three. When we played Man City last year, we had to frogmarch a City parent from the training ground. He was effing and blinding, telling the referee he’s an effing cheat. When we play City now, I tell the groundsman to shift the rope away from the pitch so the parents are 20-30 yards back.” United know kids will always be competitive, so they work on their technique first and are prepared to “isolate” themselves from those clubs sticking to Premier League rules. “In eight v eight, the three biggest kids dominate,” Kershaw said. “So we decided we would go on a four-a-side programme of development that initially revolved virtually solely around technique.” United commissioned a report from Manchester Metropolitan University which praised the “number of dribbling skills – step-over, drag-back, Cruyff Turn, feint and others – demonstrated” by the Academy’s Under-9 players while involved in four-v-four games on pitches measuring 25 metres by 25 metres. Armed with this backing from respected sports scientists, United went to the Premier League Academy directors’ meeting and argued for a change in the rules, replacing eight-v-eights for the youngest kids with four-v-fours. As one coach present described it, other clubs reacted to Kershaw’s request as if he had “thrown a hand-grenade at them”. Kershaw himself said: “The supposed experts at other clubs went: ‘Bloody ManU, if they don’t fancy it, they can pull out of the games programme.’ They didn’t listen to the argument that what we were doing was good for kids’ development.” Whelan sighed: “On Sunday morning, some clubs will travel three hours to Newcastle for one hour’s football of eight v eights for their Under-9s. Some of the players stand around a lot of the time. We refuse to go. It is far better to stay and train at home.” As Kershaw stressed: “Once a nine-year-old has learned a trick, it’s like learning his tables, it stays with him for life.” Evidence that something special was occurring at United could be found at Littleton Road with the merry bands of Under-9s and Under-10s, on Carrington’s indoor pitch with Meulensteen and the Under-11s and outside under floodlights with the Under-12s. United have become the Eton College of football. Practice makes perfect. “Experts reckon it takes 10,000 hours of training to make a top athlete,” remarked coach Eamon Mulvey. So United ensure training is fun. “At the start we often put on a five-minute DVD with tricks from Best, Maradona and Ronaldo. We’ll say, ‘Who wants to be Ronaldo? Hands up.’ Then they go off and try the tricks in a game.” All those skills are cultivated and paraded in the four-v-four contests. “We feel like a voice in the wilderness,” observed Whelan. “We’d love it if someone else did a four-v-four pilot. We need more allies. We do have some. Derby, Leicester and Liverpool are good collaborators.” Others aren’t. “When we play Huddersfield or Stoke, they are so up for it because they are playing against United,” Meulensteen said. “They work twice as hard. It’s a battle. That cannot develop players. One manager of another Academy said to me: ‘I want to see eight v eight and a nice cup of tea afterwards.’ “Being technical director of the FA is almost an impossible job because there are so many narrow-minded people out there. There’s a negative coaching culture in England. It’s crash, bang, wallop coaching. We are different. If someone makes a mistake, nobody has a go at them.” Kershaw agreed, adding: “Our poorest Under-16s are light-years in front of anything they have at Bury, Rochdale and all those clubs. We are producing very, very skilful young boys, who do the tricks and compete. By the time they are 12, they are ready to enter 11-a-side. “Barnsley’s Academy was magnificent when it was built, but unfortunately they have hit the buffers, they don’t meet the rules so they should be chucked out. We are continuing to invest. Other clubs aren’t. Chelsea were the worst, but in fairness they will be the tops now. With Kieran Richardson and Phil Bardsley maturing, the English production line still rolls at United and will accelerate in the future. “Some other clubs don’t see English nine-year-olds as cost effective,” Kershaw concluded. “Some clubs would rather take a rag-arsed Irish lad at 16, who is a hardened competitor because the Dublin and District Schools League is tough but he doesn’t have great technique.” And great technique is a quality cherished at the club that produced Charlton, Beckham and company. United: The Skill Factory, Manchester Evening News, October 8th 2005 MANCHESTER United have effected a coaching revolution which could turn out to be Sir Alex Ferguson’s greatest Old Trafford legacy. In 10 years’ time, when Ferguson is likely to have hung up his hairdryer for the last time, the Reds should be getting the benefit from a change of philosophy, which they hope will see a new generation of football talents filtering through. At the heart of this revolution, which is perhaps more of an evolution, is Dutchman Rene Meulensteen, United’s first skills development coach. United have been at the forefront of youth development during Ferguson’s time as manager, with players such as Paul Scholes, David Beckham and the Neville brothers part of the Reds line-up who proved that you could win things with kids – whatever Alan Hansen might have said. So it should come as little surprise that United have wised up to a sea change in junior football. The traditional idea of junior football as blood-and-thunder, mud-and-blunder stuff on a Sunday morning, run by tin-pot dictators and accompanied by the howls of over-ambitious parents, has been fading away for years. English football has become wise to the fact that the bulldog spirit counts for nothing when it comes up against the superior technical ability of other nations. Methods That was why Howard Wilkinson, the FA’s technical director at the time, began the academy system in 1998, in a bid to establish a series of regional centres of football excellence, connected to Premiership clubs. Now United have gone beyond that, and are pioneering new methods of teaching skills aimed at keeping the club at the forefront of European football. With the blessing of the Premier League, United have introduced four-a-side games in place of the usual eight-a-side matches, and are involved in occasional tournaments with other clubs keen to try the idea. Now the Reds are introducing a graduated system which would involve kids moving from four-a-side to seven, and then nine-a-side as they get older before finally taking the plunge into 11-a-side. Premier League director of academies Dave Richardson, who introduced Meulensteen to the club, has backed what United are trying to do. United’s own academy manager Les Kershaw, who will retire at the end of this season and be replaced by Brian McClair, is adamant that the system he helped to set up is the right way to go. “Four versus four is all about keeping kids involved, they are never out of the game,” he said. “But a lot of people still can’t understand why we don’t want to play eight versus eight. “The problem as we see it is that eight against eight tends to be dominated by the bigger, stronger kids. “In four versus four, the pitch is smaller and there are fewer players to pass to, so everyone stays in the game. “Dave Richardson had said to me that English football needed to do something different, because we were only producing robots. “To get something different, you need someone who understands kids, as well as football. “I used to be a university lecturer, and if you had put me in a primary school to teach seven-year-olds, I would have struggled to know what to say, because I was not trained for it. “A similar thing was happening in football, with people who had UEFA coaching licences, but didn’t necessarily understand kids.” Meulensteen was a disciple of former Dutch national coach Wil Coerver, who has been credited with influencing players such as Zinedine Zidane, Jurgen Klinsmann and Beckham. Coerver put the emphasis on learning basic techniques and skills from an early age, the so-called “golden age” for learning being between seven and 11. Some of Coerver’s methods have been called into question, but men such as Meulensteen have taken on board the basis of what he taught and adapted it to suit their own beliefs. The 43-year-old was drafted in by United, with the encouragement of Richardson, from Qatari club Al Saad in 2001. Meulensteen initially worked with the youngest kids in the United academy, the eight and nine-year-olds, but now works with older age groups and has even coached Ruud van Nistelrooy in individual sessions. “Other clubs know we have something going on, because when we play them we have so many skilful players,” said Kershaw. “We are lucky at United, because we are able to build for the long term. Other clubs who have begun academies have had the carpet pulled from under their feet by relegation or financial problems. “It will be 10 years before we see anything from it. Our 12-year-old age group were the first intake to benefit, although they were probably selected for the academy before Rene had an input. “We did a promotional video for Nike, in which Rene took 12 kids from a Salford school for one hour a day. These were kids who liked football, but were not necessarily in the football team. In just five one-hour sessions, there were serious improvements. “If you apply that to an elite group of kids they should, with expert tuition, be able to kick on. “The composition of a footballer is technical, tactical, physical and mental. The perfect footballer is a wonderful athlete who understands the game, has great technique and has the attitude of a John Terry. “Assessing kids for those things is not an exact science. You would never have said Paul Scholes was a wonderful athlete, but he has turned out to be a wonderful player. “On the other hand, you get kids who at eight or nine are easily the best player on the pitch, and they reach 13, have stayed at 4ft 2in. “They still have excellent technique and can do the trick, but then can’t get away from the opponent. Development “We look at all aspects of a kid’s development, even including a test for their potential height. It all costs money, but thankfully the board has backed us and the manager is fully in line with what we are doing. “We are aiming to produce good footballers, hopefully some of them for United. But we are also about producing decent human beings.” The success of United’s academy revolution will only become evident when Meulensteen’s generation of players start to reach their late teens. One of the ironies is that when it does start to come to fruition, national teams other than England could benefit more. United are unable to bring in young players from beyond a 90-minute drive of Old Trafford and it has become prudent to bring in players from overseas, where the Premier League’s restrictions and their often exorbitant transfer fees for academy players do not apply. Among the best talents in United’s academy are foreign youngsters such as Italian-American Giuseppe Rossi and Spanish defender Gerard Pique. “That won’t win the World Cup for England,” said Kershaw. “We have ended up doing things that suit Manchester United, not England.” The Premier League takes the stance of approving of United’s innovation, but feels it is not practical for all of their members on issues such as the four- versus-four debate. “It was voted out partly because many clubs don’t have enough coaches to institute it, and it would just leave kids standing around,” said a spokesman. “It is an excellent way of developing ball skills. It is something we are looking at with the FA, not just having better coaches but having more of them as well. “We are certainly not in any kind of conflict with United over this. The standard there is incredibly high, and many other clubs can learn from them.” |
Time for Morrison to come home? Posted: 29 Dec 2013 01:30 AM PST
Nearly ten years ago, when Morrison must have only been a child in our academy, I read an article about United’s youth set up and the revolutionary coaching strategies put in place by Rene Meulensteen, who was then in charge of our youth. They referred to him, not by name, but said that coaches at the club had the same expectations of success for Morrison as they had for our stars in the Class of ’92. That he was a shining light at youth level, head and shoulders above anyone else they had seen for years. It was because of his talent that United stuck by him for so long, when any other youngsters would have been shipped out a long time before. But it reached a point where enough was enough, his behaviour off the pitch as well as his behaviour at the club, not showing up for training and the like, pushed them over the edge. It was leaked to the papers that Morrison was looking for another club and that he refused to sign the contract United had offered him, but the truth of the matter was there was no contract on the table. United had to cut their losses. The club sold him to West Ham, with Sir Alex Ferguson not doubting the lad’s talent, but telling Sam Allardyce that Morrison needed to get away from Manchester. He was loaned out to Birmingham and has now returned to West Ham, where he is enjoying some great form for a not so great team. A couple of weeks ago, Morrison returned to Old Trafford with his new team but failed to make much of an impression, other than with his studs on Tom Cleverley’s ankle. The fans weren’t too impressed to see him, with a dull boo heard around the ground when his name was read out at the beginning of the game, but the majority were entirely apathetic. “I don’t know if there is a buy-back clause and what that figure might be if it even exists,” Allardyce said in October. “But my real big worry is that Manchester United will come back to buy him.” There is a clause, which you imagine Allardyce was pretending to be in the dark about, which means United could bring him back to Old Trafford for £18m. However, this isn’t the only clause in his contract. If United bid £10m for Morrison, West Ham either have to sell him to us, or they have to pay him £60k-a-week. That figure would quadruple what he is currently earning. When you consider that captain Kevin Nolan is on £55k-a-week, it simply is not an option to pay Ravel that sort of salary. There is 18 months remaining on Morrison’s current deal and West Ham are keen to agree a new contract with him and remove the clause regarding his salary. We don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes though and so it’s fairly useless to speculate. The problems with his career that came with the influences in Manchester may still be there. Or he may have realised what he almost threw away and be so relieved to get a second chance. He still knocks about with all the same crowd he did before leaving, coming back regularly to see them, but this seemingly hasn’t had a negative impact on his career at West Ham. You have to remember he was just 18-years-old when he left the club. Are we prepared to write someone off forever because of the decisions they made when they were a teenager? Essentially though, whether we want Morrison or not, it’s reassuring that the club didn’t let someone with his potential go without having a safety net. We’re in the position of power here and if we decide we do want him back, we can do it fairly easily, and if we don’t, then it’s West Ham’s issue to deal with. With the window about to open, time will tell… |
You are subscribed to email updates from Republik Of Mancunia: A Manchester United Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
0 comments :
Post a Comment